| |
History of Catholic Ecumenism
from Pope Leo XIII to Pope John XXIII

Catholic Practice of Ecumenism
|
There can be no ecumenism worthy of the name without interior conversion. For it
is from newness of attitudes of mind, from self-denial and unstinted love, that desires of
unity take their rise and develop in a mature way. - Vatican II, "Unitatis Redintegratio", Art. 7.
|
The rise of the modern ecumenical movement forced the Catholic Church to grapple with
the issue of how to relate to Christians who are not in union with Rome. Although the
Church has continually emphasized the essentiality of the union of all Christians with the
Successor of Peter, the all-too-evident fact is that vast numbers of believing, faithful
Christians are not within this union. With the prayer of Jesus "that they may all be
one" speaking to their hearts, the popes of the past century increasingly tried to
develop standards with regard to non-Catholic Christians. These attempts addressed various
issues, including the relationship between ecumenism and apologetics; the proper level of
Catholic involvement in Protestant ecumenical movements; and the effect reunion would have
upon the Catholic Church.
The teaching of the Catholic Church has always been that she possesses the fullness of
the Christian faith. Implicit in this belief is that those who do not hold all the
Catholic teachings are thereby in error in one way or another. This would necessarily
include all non-Catholic Christians. Thus, in order to bring people into the Catholic
faith, apologetics is necessary; however, ecumenism and apologetics are rarely
complimentary. Early in this century, "ecumenism" and apologetics in official
Church documents still intertwined. Writing in 1894 on the reunion of Christendom, Pope
Leo XIII stressed heavily the necessity of non-Catholic Christians returning to the
"fold". Regarding the Easts rejection of the primacy of the pope, he
stated, "But let them look back to the early years of their existence, let them
consider the sentiments entertained by their forefathers, and examine what the oldest
traditions testify, and it will, indeed, become evident to them that Christs divine
utterance, Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build My Church has
undoubtedly been realized in the Roman Pontiffs."(8) Then, addressing Protestants, he
proceeded, "Suffer that We should invite you to the unity which has ever existed in
the Catholic Church and can never fail; suffer that We should lovingly hold out Our hand
to you. The Church, as the common mother of all, has long been calling you back to
her..."(9) These apologetic statements were not uncommon in papal documents, yet have
no parallel in Unitatis Redintegratio, in which the Eastern churches as well as
Protestant churches were not explicitly asked to join the Catholic Church. This is not to
say that the Catholic Church changed her position upon the source of true unity; no, she
still proclaimed that "Christ the Lord founded one Church and one Church
only".(10) However, in order to foster ecumenical dialogue "worthy of the
name", the Church saw that apologetics and attempts at conversion were not
appropriate within the context of ecumenism.
Another issue for papal consideration in the first half of the 20th century was the
level of Catholics involvement in Protestant-organized ecumenical activities.
Protestant ecumenical work was more widespread in this century than in any other. With the
Edinburgh missionary conference of 1910 that included many different Protestant
denominations, the modern ecumenical movement was truly born. Quickly the question arose
concerning the extent of Catholic involvement in these affairs. Pope Benedict XV
(1914-1922) was the first to be forced to address this issue when the Catholic Church was
invited to a Protestant ecumenical "Faith and Order" conference in 1919. He
refused to participate in this conference; in fact, the Holy Office issued a decree on
July 4, 1919 prohibiting Catholics from taking part in conferences dealing with Christian
unity being held by separated Christians, unless the Holy See explicitly permitted such
participation.(11) This policy continued under Pope Pius XI (1922-1939), who in response
to another unity conference, issued the encyclical Mortalium Animos. In this letter Pius XI completely rejected the Protestant Ecumenical Movement of his time: "...it is
clear that the Apostolic See cannot on any terms take part in their assemblies, nor is it
anyway lawful for Catholics either to support or to work for such enterprises; for if they
do so they will be giving countenance to a false Christianity, quite alien to the
one Church of Christ."(12)
Following this strong discouragement of Catholic collaboration in Protestant unity
movements, however, slow movement toward more active Catholic participation occurred in
the years preceding Vatican II. In 1949, the Holy Office issued another decree, entitled Ecclesia
Catholica, that dealt with Catholic ecumenical involvement. This document, in many
ways, appears as a bridge between Mortalium Animos and Unitatis Redintegratio.
Seen in the light of the latter, it appears overly cautious and suspicious; yet in
comparison to the former document, progress is evident. One statement in particular from
the document reveals this: "They [the bishops] should therefore not only carefully
and efficaciously keep this movement under vigilant observation, but also prudently foster
and guide it unto the twofold end of assisting those who are in search of the truth and
the true Church..."(13) This development reached its culmination with a pronouncement
by Pope John XXIII, shortly before Vatican II. For the first time ever, papal permission
was officially granted for Catholic participation in the World Council of Churches
conference, to be held in New Delhi in 1961.(14) In fact, the Council then went a step
further when it not only allowed Catholic participation, but even called such involvement
"desirable".(15)
With the hopes of many running high this century for the real possibility of the
reunion of Christianity, a number of Church documents addressed whether or not there would
be benefits to the Catholic Church should reunion occur. In keeping with the general
attitude of Rome toward any reunion is Pope Leo XIIIs statements in Praeclara
Gratulationis that heavily emphasized the benefits that non-Catholics will gain
if they "return to the fold they have abandoned".(16) This century, however, saw
an awakening in Catholics, from the parish all the way to Rome, to the true benefits that their
Church would gain by reunion. A sampling of this new development can be seen in these
words from Pope Pius XI: "When individual men and whole peoples are thus perfectly
reconciled, the conjunction of the Church will at once be perfected through the
return of all who for whatever reasons have been separated from her."(17) The
benefits to be gained by the Catholic Church from reunion with the separated brethren was
explicitly acknowledged in Unitatis Redintegratio:
Nor should we forget that anything wrought by the grace of the Holy
Spirit in the hearts of our separated brethren can contribute to our own edification.
Whatever is truly Christian is never contrary to what genuinely belongs to the faith;
indeed, it can always bring a more perfect realization of the very mystery of Christ and
the Church.(18)
This realization by the Vatican that, in some ways, there is something missing from the
church by the disunity of all Christians, was a major step toward reunion. For reunion is
only possible after all sides realize the great scandal that exists due to fragmentation.
|
|